This is not a comparison, more a real life usage of the X100 and its successor. I just want to show the different jpg rendering and both camera´s have its own look. As far as the image quality I wouldn´t say, the X100T is better (only in high ISO above 3200). But when it comes to ease of use the X100T is much more responsive, quicker and configurable. AF locks precisely, especially in low light. In good light condition the X100 is almost on par.
Yes, I like the APS-C 16MP X-Trans CMOS sensor in the X-Pro1 and the newer generation in the X-E2. But there is something magic to the look of the 12MP Bayer sensor. JPG´s look less digital (more "organic") and especially less "waxy" than on the X-100S or X-E2. RAW is also fantastic for my taste, which ends up to be a personal choice, regardless of MP or sensor. Now I am excited to see how the IQ of the X-100T will look compared to its precessor.
without a pot
of red-brown soup
Taken with Fujifilm X-100 in Macro mode. Available light at the restaurant. SOOC using Provia filmsimulation. No post production applied!