View all essays

X100 and X100T jpgs

This is not a comparison, more a real life usage of the X100 and its successor. I just want to show the different jpg rendering and both camera´s have its own look. As far as the image quality I wouldn´t say, the X100T is better (only in high ISO above 3200). But when it comes to ease of use the X100T is much more responsive, quicker and configurable. AF locks precisely, especially in low light. In good light condition the X100 is almost on par.

All images shot with the X-100T and X100 using black&white yellow filmsimulation. No post-production, straight out of the camera.

Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100T
Fujifilm X-100
Fujifilm X-100
Fujifilm X-100
Fujifilm X-100
  • Fuji X-100...magic files

    Yes, I like the APS-C 16MP X-Trans CMOS sensor in the X-Pro1 and the newer generation in the X-E2. But there is something magic to the look of the 12MP Bayer sensor. JPG´s look less digital (more "organic") and especially less "waxy" than on the X-100S…

    Dingelsdorf at Lake Constance

    Dingelsdorf is located about 11 km away from the historic town of Konstanz. The thousand year old fishing and farming village is situated on the southern shore of Lake Überlingen. Dingelsdorf is a small and very cozy holiday resort, which is suitable…

Featured essays

Monochrom with Leica M6, M8 and M9

Leica M dialogue Read more

Olympus Pen F Half-Frame

Introduced in 1963 by Olympus. Read more

Leica M-D

The joy of anticipation Read more